once a god - now seeking for a more exciting live as human.

 

So Indonesia recommended its Bureaucracy to use open source software (not even forcing them to , just recommending) and now the International Intellectual Property Alliance ( RIAA and MPAA are members of it for example) pressures the US government to put them on a special watch list of countries which don't respect IP.

"The Indonesian government's policy... simply weakens the software industry and undermines its long-term competitiveness by creating an artificial preference for companies offering open source software and related services, even as it denies many legitimate companies access to the government market.

Rather than fostering a system that will allow users to benefit from the best solution available in the market, irrespective of the development model, it encourages a mindset that does not give due consideration to the value to intellectual creations.

As such, it fails to build respect for intellectual property rights and also limits the ability of government or public-sector customers (e.g., State-owned enterprise) to choose the best solutions.

"even as it denies many legitimate companies access to the government market." So open source offering Software companies aren't legitimate I guess and offering a product at a better price and with higher transparency (what outrageous "artificial preferences") than another company does mean denying the competitors access to the market. Wow that sounds pretty socialist.

Its interesting to note that the RIAA website servers run on Linux and use Apache.

 

 


Comments
on Feb 26, 2010

Thru out the years I have slowly moved over to open source freeware for many if not most of my programs on the computer. I have been lucky enough to find open source freeware that handles what a paid program did for me in most cases. Even Microsoft Office no longer occupies space on my hard drive as I use alternatives such as Openoffice and Google Docs. Hell, I can't even remember the last time I used IE.

Of course it's always about money. God forbid someone would want to provide something for free. I often question why some small software developers even charge $5 or $10 for the programs they make when there are often many free alternatives that work just as good if not better in some cases. I understand peoples need to want money to get the things they like but I tend to appreciate more those who ask for donations or no money at all as they tend to have the concept of wanting to use their skills to better our society as oppose to profit from it.

I'm not against people making money, but if you got something that can be found for free while your product is very cheap, why sell it? The more open source freeware we have, the less likely someone will make software based on the idea to make money, making them put out incomplete, bug filled software just to get you to buy it sooner to avoid loses for every day that goes buy that they are not selling the product. But that's just my opinion.

on Feb 26, 2010

Good for Indonesia, if they do. Probably the only big drawback for Open Source is their is no one to call/blame if something goes wrong. Most governments like to get a reasonable assurance of support on such things.

on Feb 26, 2010

That's a common misconception about Open Source.

If you need support, you can buy it from Red Hat, Oracle, Canonical and thousands of other vendors. This is probably better than the support you'd get from closed source vendors, because you can both see the product you're using in it's entirety, i.e. no man behind the curtain.

So the process is more transparent and thus valuable to the consumer.

The actions in the article are borderline hilarious.

on Feb 26, 2010

Nitro Cruiser
Good for Indonesia, if they do. Probably the only big drawback for Open Source is their is no one to call/blame if something goes wrong. Most governments like to get a reasonable assurance of support on such things.

Ditto on NC's statement.  Except the call/blame part.  Like you can talk to someone about Microsoft who actually is understandable?

on Feb 27, 2010

If you need support, you can buy it from Red Hat, Oracle, Canonical and thousands of other vendors. This is probably better than the support you'd get from closed source vendors, because you can both see the product you're using in it's entirety, i.e. no man behind the curtain.

So the process is more transparent and thus valuable to the consumer.

Sure you can buy support. That's why Linux is the industry standard....oh maybe not. One needs to ask why that is. You did hit the nail on the head though in one respect, show me a big company, especially a government, that wants transparency of their system. Any knowledgeable Linux hobbyist on the street will have a copy of your basic (or more) code (not that some can't get their hands on MS code, I've just seen many more putter with the various Linux flavors). I'm not knocking any of the multitude of flavors of open source Linux, or the pay for versions of Linux and Unix available, I am of the opinion there are some very good ones. The difference between an single MS and a Linux administrator in these parts is about 25K+ a year, and thats just for servers, their client PC's still run Windows. Now imagine how many an entire govt. entity (like Indonesia) would require.

 I can't comment on the paid support or its cost, since I've never personally used it, but if you have a truly open-source system (servers and clients) that fewer people are trained to operate or work on it, the bigger the $$$upport dollars are and maybe even regular employees that may never have seen let alone used it before. There is a reason why companies like Oracle and Sun MicroSystems, make big (maybe not MS big) dollars while have a (much) smaller piece of the pie compared to MS. Choice is great though.

on Feb 27, 2010

Ditto on NC's statement. Except the call/blame part. Like you can talk to someone about Microsoft who actually is understandable?

LOL, just get it in your SLA's when the contract is written Doc.

on Feb 27, 2010

The RIAA are a bunch of Nazis. Reacting that way over a suggestion just demonstrates their fascist tendencies.  Their statement suggests that open source software wouldn't be the "best solutions" for Indonesia.  Just because something costs a lot of money and is covered by thousands of patents doesn't make it the best. Having dealt with Microsoft's "support" in past jobs I can tell you that Red Hat or Canonical's support is vastly superior and more effective at problem resolution.

 

on Feb 28, 2010

Just because something costs a lot of money and is covered by thousands of patents doesn't make it the best.

I agree 100%.

Our government costs a ton of money, gives lousy support and doesn't function correctly when it is supposed to be working. Yet we get the same old thing every election year.  I'm ready for some open-source here as well.

 

on Feb 28, 2010

Nitro Cruiser

Just because something costs a lot of money and is covered by thousands of patents doesn't make it the best.
I agree 100%.

Our government costs a ton of money, gives lousy support and doesn't function correctly when it is supposed to be working. Yet we get the same old thing every election year.  I'm ready for some open-source here as well.

 

Open source politics, now there's a damn good idea!